AI search visibility · AI governance software

Why do some companies get recommended by AI while others don't?

MKMohit Kumar6 min readOriginal post

Why do some companies get recommended by AI while others don't? I decided to investigate this in one specific sector: AI governance and compliance software.

I tested 5 AI assistants (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity and DeepSeek) using 10 buyer-intent questions, analysing 50 answers, 1,293 brand mentions and 179 companies. I also reviewed 30 third-party ranking articles and 20 company websites.

AI assistants
5
AI assistants
buyer-intent questions
10
buyer-intent questions
answers analysed
50
answers analysed
brand mentions
1,293
brand mentions
companies
179
companies
ranking articles
30
ranking articles
company websites
20
company websites

7 findings that surprised me

01Mentions ≠ recommendations

Seven companies appeared in at least 15 answers but never reached the top five. One was mentioned 38 times without a single top-five placement.

02A few companies dominated

Just 5 companies captured 55% of all top-five placements. Only 51 of 179 companies reached the top five.

179 companies were mentioned. Only a small group consistently made the shortlist.
Bar chart of the AI Visibility Index for AI governance software: IBM 61, Credo AI 59, OneTrust 38, Holistic AI 35, ServiceNow 30, ModelOp 27. Five brands took 55% of all top-five spots across 50 AI answers.

03AI assistants disagree

On a typical question, two assistants shared only around 32% of their top-ten recommendations.

Ask five AI assistants the same question, get five different shortlists.
Heatmap of top-10 recommendation overlap between ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity and DeepSeek. Most alike: ChatGPT and Claude at 42%. Least alike: Gemini and DeepSeek at 21%. Average overlap 32%.

04Technical SEO isn't everything

Some less-visible companies had llms.txt, structured data and accessible websites. Technical foundations matter, but they don't guarantee recommendations.

05Positioning matters

Some companies had extensive content but described themselves inconsistently. One company's old name kept appearing in AI answers after a rebrand.

06Great content isn't enough

One company had the strongest measured content among dedicated vendors, yet was absent from two assistants and appeared in just 4 of 30 ranking articles. Analyst recognition also didn't guarantee top placements.

07Visibility extends beyond your website

Third-party article coverage correlated strongly with AI mentions. Leading companies generally linked a YouTube channel from their websites; less-visible companies had no YouTube presence, even when they published webinars or podcasts.

Brands listed in more “best tools” articles get named more often by AI assistants.
Scatter plot of ranking-article coverage against AI mentions for 28 brands. Coverage moved closely with AI mentions (Spearman rho 0.86) and with top-five spots (rho 0.58).

These are observed patterns, not proof of causation.

What should businesses do?

  1. Test real buyer questions across multiple AI assistants.
  2. Track top-three and top-five placements, not just mentions.
  3. Make your positioning and use cases crystal clear.
  4. Audit crawlability, sitemaps and structured data.
  5. Build credibility through genuine reviews, comparison articles, analyst coverage and discoverable video.

Repeat the tests and measure changes over time.

Five steps to improve how AI assistants see your business.
Five steps: test real buyer questions, measure positions not just mentions, clarify your positioning, audit your foundations, build credibility beyond your website.

The takeaway

This exploratory study changed how I think about AI visibility. It's not just about technical optimisation or publishing more content.

Are you building a great product, or making it easy for buyers and AI assistants to understand, compare and recommend it?

The next visibility challenge may be getting onto the shortlist when a buyer asks AI what to choose.

Source: 5 AI assistants × 10 buyer questions (50 answers), 30 ranking articles, 20 company websites. October 2026.